The following is an excerpt from a Bertrand Russell piece that I linked to in 2005:
The method of a hereditary leisure class without duties was, however, extraordinarily wasteful. None of the members of the class had been taught to be industrious, and the class as a whole was not exceptionally intelligent. The class might produce one Darwin, but against him had to be set tens of thousands of country gentlemen who never thought of anything more intelligent than fox-hunting and punishing poachers. At present, the universities are supposed to provide, in a more systematic way, what the leisure class provided accidentally and as a by-product. This is a great improvement, but it has certain drawbacks. University life is so different from life in the world at large that men who live in an academic milieu tend to be unaware of the preoccupations and problems of ordinary men and women; moreover their ways of expressing themselves are usually such as to rob their opinions of the influence that they ought to have upon the general public. Another disadvantage is that in universities studies are organized, and the man who thinks of some original line of research is likely to be discouraged. Academic institutions, therefore, useful as they are, are not adequate guardians of the interests of civilization in a world where everyone outside their walls is too busy for unutilitarian pursuits.
In some respects I've spent a great deal of time casting about for a Darwin when it is far more practical to cast for "country gentlemen." I'm spending far too much time on the independent contractor side of the equation and not enough on the client side of the equation. I recently took the time to edit a portion of this blog into book form. While it was lovely to see it in book form, the material is only going to appeal to a small portion of the population. By contrast, the concept that has evolved on these "pages" is something that most of the population will find appealing. This should be my focus.
Most people need a hedge against the "economic growth" paradigm. Joining a club that builds only ecologically sound projects is one way to hedge the existing paradigm -- and it is far more comprehensive than any of the carbon offset schemes. Instead of sending your money off to one of the offset schemes and never seeing it again, it makes more sense to deposit the money in a private club account. Utilize it to have access to an eco-spa some time in the future. For those who are placing property in a land trust in order to prevent it from being turned into a sprawling subdivision, it makes far more sense to contribute the land to a club that builds eco-spa villages. The value of your land is credited to your account and you can access it in the future.
There are thousands of potential partners for this effort of growing a club that provides a hedge against the current paradigm. Authors of a wide range of books. Environmental groups. Individuals. Equipment coops such as REI and Mountain Equipment Coop.
Matt
Recent Comments