This
dynamic between “use” and “thing” value plays itself out even in ideas
of social progress. Those inclined toward possession-oriented, “thing”
value, feel and act on an underlying assumption that the more money and
attention they can attract to themselves, their cause, or their
organization the better the world will be. People of this mindset end
up counterproductively vying against each other to be the lead
spokesperson in “saving the world,” fracturing limited resources in
order to fund limited visions in a situation that fundamentally requires
cooperation to be effectively solved. To be viable, personality and
mission-driven idealism will have to cede itself to collaborative
problem-solving pragmatism, i.e. “use” over “thing.”
Recent Comments